sea ark tourney revised

SUBSCRIBE!

Heartland Outdoors magazine is published every month.
Subscription Term

Or call (309) 741-9790 or e-mail: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

May 2012 Cover

Archive

May 2012
S M T W T F S
29 301 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011

Recent entries

John
JOHN
SOEHN

The Back 40

Are your doe numbers down?

Tue, November 29, 2011

Though it took me till now to write this, I’ve been thinking about this for several years now.  This year, more than any other since I started hunting 24 years ago, I’ve become very scared of what is happening to our deer herd.  In particular, does.  I’m just not seeing any this year.  Since October 1st, I haven’t seen more than a few does while hunting.  At first, I thought it was just my place.  Then I started asking other hunters in the Peoria-Knox County area.  Everyone I’ve asked, and I mean every single one, has had the same experience.  Hardly any does. 

So who is to blame?  I believe it’s the fault of hunters.  Just because someone sells us unlimited tags to kill them doesn’t mean we have to.  This year has been horrible in terms of doe sightings.  I’ve seen several does on my trail cameras, but not that many.  Bucks?  I have plenty of them.  Particularly 1.5 year-olds.  Too many actually.  If I end up with an unused ES tag, which is looking very likely this year, I think I’d rather fill it with a young buck for the freezer than a doe.  She is, after all, the baby maker.  The young buck will not make me more deer, but the doe will. 

All reports I’m getting this season are the same.  Tons of young bucks and no does.  I believe our young buck sighting are way up this year because of the lack of does.  The fewer does there are, the more the young boys have to be out and about searching for them. 

Are we on our way to disaster?  I believe we are.  I’m sure some who read this will call me a whiner…saying that their area is overpopulated with does.  I know those areas exist, and if you hunt an area like that, keep killing your does.  This article doesn’t apply to your land.  You are fortunate.  But for most other areas in central Illinois, I do believe the sky is falling.  We are now seeing what bad decisions coming from Springfield and bad decisions from hunters drooling for more tags has done.  I think we can all talk and preach till the cows come home about not shooting so many does, but I don’t think the people who are to blame subscribe to sites like this one.  I don’t think they subscribe to any sort of game management at all.  We’ve all heard “if it’s brown it’s down.”  It used to be a joke.  Not any longer.  It’s now the mantra of fools who think we can shoot anything and everything without any negative impact at all. 

I believe the dream ratio of 1:1, buck to doe, is crazy.  It’s unnatural.  It doesn’t provide a safety net for disease or overhunting.  Sure it makes the bucks move more to find receptive does which makes them more visible to us hunters, therefore making them more prone to end up on our walls.  But is 1:1 a good ratio for the deer, or is it a good ratio for us hunters?  Sitting in a seminar at the Deer Classic several years ago in Bloomington, I listened while the speaker talked about killing as many does as you can.  I raised my hand to ask him a question.  The “expert” called on me, and I asked, “How many is enough and how do you know when you’ve shot too many?”  His answer….“When you’ve scared yourself into thinking that you’ve just shot the last doe, then your getting close.”  From that point on I put very little faith in what he had to say.  It was just my opinion, but I knew he was wrong.  But how many hunters in the room took his advice and killed every doe they saw in order to produce bigger racks?  Oh yeah, this seminar was focused on producing bigger bucks.  Please don’t think I’m taking a shot at head hunters, because most of them pay tons of attention to game management.  However, this used to be the formula…or at least a big part of it.  Kill more does making the bucks move more and leaving more prime bedding and food to the bucks.  In recent years, I too have become much more of a head hunter, mostly just to increase the challenge and raise my bar a little.  I just don’t think head hunting has to involve shooting that many does…unless you really have too many.  I’ve actually heard hunters tell stories of how they use does as target practice.  Does do make for good target practice in real hunting situations on real animals, but it must be done with control and management in mind. 

Gun hunters, please take your finger off the trigger because you’re going to hate this part.  Those of you who hunt with guns only and do it responsibly, please spread your knowledge.  “If it’s brown it’s down” is too often the case with gun hunting groups.  I rarely hear 1 or 2 shots coming from an area.  It’s usually a flurry of 6-12 shots.  If you missed the deer standing still at 50 yards, chances are you’re not going to hit running at 100 yards.  When I see trailers and trucks full of deer during the various gun seasons, they’re not piles of bucks, they’re piles of does and button bucks.  Just because you saw 6 does on a hunt doesn’t mean you have 30.  Yet some hunting groups feel perfectly fine shooting all 6.  Last week while driving to my property for an afternoon gun hunt, I saw two trucks, one with a trailer, standing on the side of the road.  The trailer had every bit of 10-12 fawns on it.  Two ratchet straps holding down the pile of deer.  Next to the trucks were three men and one young kid.  They must have shot every deer they saw. 

Conservation and Department of Natural Resources.  What a joke.  If they had any concern whatsoever about our deer herd, they’d pay attention to hunters who are in the field.  Rather, they pay attention to what lobbyists want.  We can take their power away easily.  Let them sell all the tags they want, just don’t buy them.  I used to buy about 10 tags per year and fill 4-5 of them believing that my tag money went into habitat.  As soon as I found out my money went elsewhere, I just started buying what I need.  We, the hunters, need to be proactive for what we know is right. 

No matter what plan we come up with though, some groups, hunting groups, will complain that they’re getting singled out or ripped off….forgetting that it’‘s not about them, rather about the deer.  If it’s brown it’s down is crazy.  Absolutely nuts!  Bowhunters and gunners both have factions with this attitude.  However, and gunners aren’t going to like this, there are far more “if it’s brown it’s down” gunners than bowhunters.  Gun hunting is more of a party thing for some and it’s not only acceptable to have a pile of deer in a truck, it’s cooler.  Not so in the archery world.  I am certainly not talking about every gunner out there.  However, just look at the numbers of how many deer get killed in 7 days versus the other 3.25 months.  The numbers are staggering.  When is enough going to to be enough?  When will the state be satisfied with the number of does left standing?  I believe it’s never.  Every time they reach a goal, the numbers of tags doesn’t go down.  We must make the number of kills go down.  The DNR doesn’t kill deer, we do.  I have some pretty great neighbors which makes me very fortunate.  We all seem to have very similar goals for the area’s deer herd.  We do have one slaughter group in the area that kills everything that walks, but that doesn’t mean we can’t do our part to help the herd.  Doe numbers are down and it’s going to hurt us real bad, real soon.  All of us hunters, bow, gun, crossbow…all better start to pay attention and make a difference.  It’s real easy.  Does make more deer.  It wouldn’t take long to make a significant change either.  In just a few short years we could undo anything that overkilling has done.  All I ask is that everyone consider management for the future.  We used to have what I considered to be the best Whitetail state in the country.  Not so anymore.  We still have our share of great bucks, but without does, the sky will fall. 

Treehugger

Comments

I agree,  I won’t shoot does.  It has been 4 years since I last shot a doe.  I’ve recognized the same thing you have.

Posted by sniper308 on November 30

I started hunting 4 years ago. It was preached to me that there are way too many does. Kill 1 and you take 3 from the farm fields and road accidents. I believed what I heard until last year when I started noticing there were fewer and fewer deer to be seen. This year has been terrible. Many days of hunting where I haven’t seen a single deer. I hunt public land quite abit and when talking to the rangers even they say the numbers are down and getting worse. The site I hunt requires a doe first before you can shoot a buck. This is making it even worse.

Posted by spanky32354 on November 30

agreed… every farm is differant and needs to be managed so!

1 farm i hunt i shot a doe 10 years ago and havent since.. i could have but
ive been trying to bring the deer #s up..its hard when you have 4 people gun hunting trying to fill their tags… its an up hill battle

you get people shooting 6+ deer and donateing 5… dont shoot them…

hunting is 50% this year and 50% next year! you gotta think about the future.

i think a 1:1 is over managing..it works in texas, because they have 10,000 acres ranches and feed deer year round… and have been managed for 20+ years.. i still think its not the best ratio…

i hear farmers say shoot all the deer theres soo many… then i sit all day and see 4 does and 3 bucks… haha im thanksful for that but, id like to see more than that!!

another thing.. much of damage to corn people think is deer…is actually racoons!

Posted by foodplotPhil on November 30

Wow - Last year I started the same topic with the same opinions on AT and just got blasted page after page from greedy hunters imho. Only a few saw this happening. Most have the opinion of “if the state of IL is giving me X number of tags to fill, then I have to fill every single one”.
These a re the same guys that gripe and moan about our IL goverment, yet when it comes to their own agenda and greed they look the other way that the sate MUST be right.

Posted by dextee on November 30

I hunt Henry Co. and bow hunt between 40-50 times from 18 different stands on 3 different farms before gun season every year and haven’t had a shot at a doe in 2 years. Lots of little bucks and a few wall mounters too. We were guilty of listening to the State as well. Basically Henry county has unlimited doe tags if you hunt gun/muzzle load. Haven’t seen 10 does in the last 2 years. My hunting buds would say the same.

Posted by deerman on November 30

I’ve noticed a steep decline in numbers in my area.  Four years ago I’d see between 75-100 deer come to the fields to feed every night next to my home.  Now I’m lucky to see 2-3.  I’d already decided I wasn’t taking any does for next several years, but everyone around me shoots everything that moves come gun season.  I believe my situation is due more to poaching that occurs as the deer move up closer to the roads after dark.  I’ve caught several people spotlighting, but they take off before I can get to them.  Also reported it several times to DNR, but they don’t pay too much attention to the doe’s.

Posted by DewittCoDeerStalker on November 30

I hunt public land in Henry and Bureau county and have seen more does this year than ever,only 2 bucks though.  What really got me thinking was watching the Crush with the Lakosky’s and Lee said they normally shoot 100-200 does a season (with help from other hunters). Yeah more food for the big bucks But what about breeding, seems to me with less does there is going to be less breeding which in turn would mean less deer. Seems like that cold be a problem over time or maybe its just an every few years thing.

Posted by bowfisher1 on November 30

Hunters have to be managers, plain and simple. If you count on the DNR to do your management you need to understand that they are mostly reactive, not pro-active. There is always a 2 year lag time as the data is collected and broken down, then at least another year for any regulatory change. Those are the absolute minimums for the state to make management changes and the reality is usually double that. Then you need to accept that the state’s goals and the individual hunters goals are not always the same.

The DNR does set the tone and mentality for many though. DNR programs such as “I took a doe so the herd won’t grow” almost unlimited gun permits/ unlimited bow permits and “Sportsmen Against Hunger” give many hunters the excuse for killing, that they need. In their mind, management is not part of hunting- all they need as an excuse to kill is that the state says kill more does, or I donate them all to SAH or I have a fist full of tags to fill.

For those fortunate enough to have private lands to hunt or have land of their own it is simple, do your own management, do what your observations and instincts tell you is right. 1:1?, 2:1? wildlife management is not an exact science but if you just go with your conscience and not your ego you will be a pretty good wildlife manager for your property.

Posted by The Colonel on November 30

I’ve read or heard somewhere that the sex of deer offspring is partly influenced by the buck:doe ratio and the status of the current local deer population. I can’t remember which way it swings (more does produced in poor conditions or more bucks produced in poor conditions) but maybe that could at least partly explain why you’re seeing so many 1.5 yr olds. I don’t believe everything I hear or see, though, so I would definitely agree with you that hunters are a large contributing factor to the state of your local deer herd. And you’re right: it is a top-down problem, beginning with the DNR’s submission to the agenda of insurance agencies and “special interest groups” to reduce overpopulated deer herds, assuming that the entire state is overpopulated to some degree. It falls upon us hunters to show some discipline and a little restraint and, like Phil said, keep next year in mind…
******
I’m heading out for the 2nd shotgun season this weekend without having any tags filled yet(archery or firearm). It’s not for lack of deer sightings….well, it is for 1st shotgun season but not archery. Fortunately, the doe population near me seems pretty robust. We don’t have “brown/down” lunatics near our grounds.  And those that do shoot does do so in moderation. Thus far, no one that I know of has shot a doe off any of the properties we hunt this year.  We usually shoot a doe or two every other year if the situation is right. This year I’ll likely pass.

Posted by Walston on November 30

On our 240 we have an awesome doe herd, We will take 5-6 does early then we leave them alone as of dec 1, Its no problem too see 25-30 in the food plots everynight…

Posted by WhitetailFreak on November 30

I haven’t bought a tag in two years. Its just not worth my time to sit for seven days and only see one or two deer. I have about 200 acres to hunt on, 40 tillable and 160 timber. Its on the Illinois River bluffs, has a nice creek with food and bedding areas but very few deer. There used to be heavily used deer trails all over the area. There were 4 hunters on it this first gun season and only 1 deer was shot.

Posted by flint on November 30

It has been my experience the last few seasons that the doe populations vary greatly depending on location. For example, I see 20-30 does/fawns per hunt on a farm in Fulton County, but on the 3 farms I hunt in McDonough County, I see very few does anymore. I would gladly shoot a doe or two on that Fulton County farm, but I have been afraid to shoot any does on the other farms I hunt. I have passed on does for 3 years and still see very few of them. 

Let’s face it, the state is not going to manage our herd. Treehugger is right, its all up to us.  Some places have too many does, and some not enough.

Posted by phelpsy80 on November 30

I heard the same thing on The Crush.  I couldn’t believe the amount of does they shoot.  If you watch the show, take a look at the bucks.  Almost every single one of them are all scarred up.  I believe it’s due to more fighting for the the few does in the area.  If they shoot that many does each year, obviously they have tons of them.  But maybe they’re taking too many out.  My bruisers all look great….horn and hide.  Could it be possible to have too many bruisers and not enough does?  Possibly.  That may not make for the healthiest herd.  One thing I did notice at my place this year is that many of the 1.5 year-old bucks have broken racks.  More than half of them I’d say.  Probably also due mostly to more figting.  Lots of small bucks plus a lack of does equals lots of small bucks fighting each other.  I have a trail camera video of two such bucks….each with busted up racks fighting near a scrape.  Every bruiser I have on video though has a perfect rack.

Posted by Treehugger on November 30

Illinois’ deer herd is definitely getting worse. I shot my first doe in almost a decade, last year. I passed up every doe this year along with several bucks in the 120-140 range. Even though I’m a head hunter, my philosophy is this; take the oldest animals out if possible and leave the younger, stronger animals to maintain a healthy herd. Shooting younger animals removes the strongest. A mature buck will eventually get old enough where it’s difficult for him to protect himself, thus leaving him destined for a miserable death either by harsh winters or being eaten alive by predators. Contrary what many believe, the B&C club was started for animal conservation using this very method, and not for bragging rights. Treehugger is right, we must take the herd control in our own hands! I have no problem eating tag soup each year with does, or bucks, and the results do surface in just a few years. If you have an abundance of small bucks and no does, I also think it would be better to take a buck for the freezer if you are having difficult closing the deal on a mature buck. FYI, I eat mature bucks all of the time and they taste great! There is a way to prepare them though, but it mainly just consists of aging them for a few days!

Posted by Marc Anthony on November 30

Treehugger, I noticed the small bucks appeared to be more busted up than usual this year too. There were so many bucks and not very many does, the competition was really high. It also seemed like every doe I watched getting chased was very young. All the old does seemed to have disappeared. I did see a lot more good bucks this year and I 100% think it is because of the lack of doe sighthings.

Posted by phelpsy80 on November 30

Not only small bucks here. My dad shot a nice 3.5 yr old 8 pointer this year only to find that 3 tines were broken 1-2 inches above the main beam. The 2 biggest breaks were on the far side antler so my dad couldn’t see that this buck had broken head gear before the shot. He was pretty massive…well, would have been massive if he had all his head gear. Now I’m after whatever caused it!

Posted by Walston on November 30

My two biggest bucks still have perfect racks.  Though they usually get busted up as well, not the case this year.  I did have a 145"ish 8-point with a HUGE body by me the other day and he had one of his G-3’s busted in half.  No marks on his body though.  I only have one buck running around with soome hide damage.  Watch The Crush though.  Almost every big buck is VERY damaged.  That can’t be good to have that much competition. 

Marc, I totally agree.  Shoot from the top.  There’s nothing wrong with taking a young one for the table every year, but they can’t be used for “target practice”.

Posted by Treehugger on November 30

Treehugger and others, Hunting as we had in the early part of the century is over.  As one of the posters stated, people that arent hunting seriously and just listen to the media and other kill mongers want to kill everything and actually have biologist giving them the excuse to do so.  I too have heard to shoot every doe you see crap out of them and i personally think it makes them sound retarded.  Does do not do what bucks do when scared,  they do not go noturnal, they only become more alert and this does no help for them to survive gun season.  They are frankly sitting targets.  I have NEVER shot a doe and have seen this coming since i was a 18 year old kid.  As KC how much ive hated doe shooting for years, hes one of the few that has seen my posts for years.  Back when i was a “radical”.  I am happy about tree hugger posting its the hunters fault.  Usually hunters make up some lame excuse about disease or sharp shooters or natural trends or poor fawn crop.  If we have 800,000 deer in illinois currently which is a high estimate, and kill and report 200,000 deer in illinois per year through hunting, and i would bet since ive found 5 bucks this year already that have been killed with archery gear and lost that likely 75,000 are lost a year as an estimate.  WHen you add natural mortality, car kills, and poaching to the mix, it doesnt take long for the herd to die.  What i will say is that this isnt on me but its on most other hunters.

Posted by clintharvey on November 30

You really think that because you don’t see does they are not there?  Maybe if stayed out of the woods until the weekend before Thanksgiving you would see more does?  Instead you run them out for 2 months and then expect them to stick around for your enjoyment all yr.  I look at it like this 61% of deer killed were bucks that means that bucks are getting targeted from gun hunters, or there ARE more bucks and hunters are trying to correct it.  If you are expecting 80% of the kill to be bucks and 60-80% of the gun hunting world to eat tag soup- your disconnected from reality. 

Posted by PIMPSTAFFER HATER on November 30

pimp whatever.. i agree with your point…

just because you dont see deer, doesnt mean their not there…

but it is pretty consistant, people are seeing fewer deer… and i think some hunters are hurting our herd more then they know!

ive seen it, hunting and guiding, deer know where stands are, and they avoid when possible… patterns change, stands that use to be hot 5 years ago, arent as good as they once were.

people mention the crush… they plant 100’s of acres of foodplots, thus increasing their carrying capacity, and they dont shoot little bucks, and they manage big pieces of land in iowa with little pressure… so its not really comparable to here in illinois… illinois in general is pressured far more than iowa!!


our society wants it,  here and now, and deer hunting is not that way!!


 

Posted by foodplotPhil on November 30

‘I toke a doe so the herd wouldn’t grow’
Remember that little catch phrase our IDNR coined 20 years ago ????
1991, the IDNR ever gave out free deer pins at every check station that year, that said just that.
Our IDNR/task force/IL Farm Bureau/Insurance Comps…have further pushed that very mentality, on hunters, for 2 decades now. Way too many hunters have bought into it too. That is why we are seeing less does AND will have less deer, for years still to come.
MORE & MORE antlerless tags, antlerless only seasons, forced combo tags, extended antlerless seasons, unlimited antlerless tags, ect…..
The IDNR AND others, have been planning/doing this for years now, nothing new here.
Like I said, way to many deerhunters have been helping THEIR agenda out.

Posted by Lynn on November 30

There may be a lot of different things happening, but how do they all get addressed. Not blaming gun hunters but someone takes up deer hunting (shotgun) they buy the best gun & ammo as advertised. They shoot a deer it runs off and goes more than 30-40 yards they probably think they missed and wait for another one. They think between the gun and ammo there is no way the deer was hit This goes back to Treehuggers article about tracking. Something like that should be with every gun AND bow that is sold. Guy’s that just gun hunt don’t really care what a bow hunter thinks he only has a few days to hunt and wants his (can’t blame them) but they think we are pulling their leg when we say they are not as many deer. Like stories that I have read, they see a small herd in a field and open up fill their tags not knowing that may be the only deer in that area. I think yotes are causing more damage than we all think. I also think they are staying out in the open more and moving more at night. Mature doe’s may not be as smart as mature buck’s but they didn’t get old by being dumb either. The Farm Bureau & Insurance Industry needs to stay out of hunting.

Posted by berlin on November 30

get rid of the late antlerless seasons,go back to the way it was in the early 90’s when you only got one tag need more revenue for dnr charge the out of state hunter’s and outfitter’s more they have thousands to spend on leases.We have several farms around a forest preserve that they opened up to bow hunting several years ago the rules were shoot as many does as you could buy tags for but you could only shoot one buck we used to see between 30 to 40 deer in the evening now your’re lucky to see a doe mostly 1.5 year old bucks pretty sad when rock island county starts trying to manage our state park for trophy deer as far as the trophy hunters you hear every year they sell racks to cabelas or bass pro for thousands of dollars I call BSF on that they don’t buy that many deer and from what I’ve personally seen people say they sold I would just skull cap most of em until the honest hunters get the say on how many tags are distributed and the hunting shows and high profile names are obsolete I think we are all in trouble as far as deer numbers unless you control 30,000 acres and don’t have the brown it’s down wannabe hunters around you that shoot anything that moves I’ve seen piles of deer in pickups that look like they lost their spots yesterday whats the point you getting 10 lbs. of meat from that deer or just wanting to say you tagged out that year.

Posted by gut21 on November 30

most people are seeing fewer deer so that means that if they hav sat in the woods 20-30 times in a season and are only seeing the same 2-3 does every time chances are that they are going to shoot one and hurt the deer herd that much more just because they want the meat which is understandable and i am even guilty of it but i just shoot what i will eat and NO MORE! but it is hard to reach the people that actually need to see this article because they have no interest in listening and even though they can pick the mag up for free in a ton of places they will skip right over this story because it says nothing about big bucks and the whole hunting world is to blame for that but for the select few of us that do care it makes us feel helpless because even though we are not over hunting none of us control enough land to keep the deer from naturally roaming in to the WARZONES that all these small properties hav become and i hunt public ground exclusively so with all the pressure most guys are in the mind set that the first thing they see they hav to whack it and stack it instead of enjoying the HUNT and just seeing nature in its rawest form and taking lots of good memories home instead of a 50 pound doe fawn just because they dont want someone else to shoot it… crappy philosophy but thats what is has came to and then the nieghbors to the state parks alot of us hunt are bad for the herd to bacause they overhunt also just so the SMALL GUY that cant afford what they hav cant kill “THEIR” deer and im not saying they all do but like i said the few that do will never see this so the problem continues and everyone preaches to introduce new hunters to our world but thats hard to do when they come out with the attitude that they are gonna see a ton of deer cuz thats how tv makes it look and the dnr makes it sound and they go out at the start only to be disappointed when they sit till the weather turns cold and hav not gotten one of the millions of deer that illinois is supposed to hav and end up selling their stuff after shooting just to sight it in and u cant change their mind and then they spread to other prospective new hunters how bad it sux and in turns prolly sways a few of them away from it all together….sorry for getting off subject a few times but these are a few of the biggest problems we face as true hunters in my opinion so all we can do is just keep being positive and do what we do but im afraid that a small group of us as we are dont hav the power to change anything happening and until the people with that power get what they want it shall remain as is….. sadly

Posted by bucksntrucks on November 30

PIMP…I understand your point as well.  I know there are more deer than I see.  That’s obvious.  But this isn’t just my observation.  I’ve heard this from everyone I’ve spoken to lately.  Everyone.  I hunt about the same amount of days each year, so shouldn’t I see this same lack of does every year according to what you said?  I started noticing this a few years ago, but this year the lack of does seemed overwhelming compared to past years.  I’m not even saying that hunters, gun or bow, shouldn’t shoot does.  I shoot one every year.  I’m just saying that maybe some people need to check themselves before killing a truckload.  When is the last time you saw a group of bowhunters pull up to a tavern with a pile of deer in the truck?  The number of tagged and registered gun deer is staggering to me.  And that doesn’t include wounded deer, untagged deer, etc.  We just need to think before we pull the trigger on everything we see.  Deer are a renewable resource, but they’re not unlimited.

GUT…How do you really feel?  smile

BUCKSNTRUCKS…Love the run-on sentence…seriously. 

Posted by Treehugger on November 30

Good article. I’ve hunted the same farm the last 3 seasons and each year I’ve seen less does.  This year has really been alarming. What’s strange is the area I hunt does not have a lot of pressure and it’s some of the finest deer habitat in Illinois. I feel the decline is a combination of different factors and there are way too many “killers” these days, not “hunters”.

Posted by mgehant on November 30

I think it’s a combination as well.  Coyotes, etc.  But the one thing we have absolute control of is our trigger fingers.

Posted by Treehugger on November 30

I’m frustrated this yr as well. Where I hunt it seems a drought yr
Iike this yr is to blame
for fewer deer sightings , I still know there should be deer in the bottoms that i can’t see. But everyone I talk too are reporting then same thing….. Where are the does? I love to shoot does- maybe more than bucks but there are fewer to be seen. if we re-wind a cpl yrs when we had serious floods would we all agree we saw more deer? I think the rivers in Central/West Central Illinois are a huge factor. But I don’t want to say too much double speak- We control our herd!!!!!! Our state does not.

Posted by Mallardmike on November 30

I am in Northeast Knox county and the first gun season I saw 9 deer . 1 monster , 1 will be monster next year , 5 does, 1 small basket rack and 1 spike that was under my stand crossing my creek when out of no where 3 coyotes came full tilt straight at him. Kinda caught me by surprise. They chased him into a big crp field and harassed him for at least 10 minutes . I made up my mind from then on any coyote I see and can kill clean will get a one ounce slug for breakfast. I like to hunt but do not need to , if deer hunting stopped tomorrow it would be a sad day. It seems they(deer) like any resource we have in abundance, we as a whole use it like it will never run out. Sad.I just hope that the deer do not go the way of the American Bison. The day I start seeing little to no deer in my neck of the woods , I will hang up my bow and shotgun and quit hunting. I hope everyone has a safe season and just think about this. The next doe you see and want to shoot may be the mother of the next Illinois state record.

Posted by knoxcounty on December 01

Then going another way, this has been a very dry fall with a lot of creeks dried up and limited water sources. I have always heard that deer can get by with out water for 3 or 4 days, and how often does a yearling have to have water? But could the deer be moving into areas that water is more available with out having to travel so far. Another thing, and I may be wrong on this also, is that when the farmers put Anhydrous Ammonia on the fields it seems to me the deer move out of that area for a while, not saying that the deer will leave completey or not move through that area. I have stands that I see a lot of deer, andhydrous is worked in and the deer seem to move. I have even noticed this going back & forth from work before in fields. Some have wrote that the doe’s were there last year, and most know who is hunting in their general area & what deer are taken, or have a pretty good idea anyway. So either they were poached, taken by predators or moved on and changed there habits. I do agree that less doe tags be issued, and the the Late Winter hunt be done away with.

Posted by berlin on December 01

I honestly don’t mind the bowhunters in the park next to us due to the deer density did need thinned down some. I just think they overdid it a little bit. As far as the guy’s that hunt public land due to not having private ground to hunt sorry that you don’t have a piece of property to try and manage but let’s face it what honest hard working person can afford to outbid the outfitters and big city lawyers and such that are buying up private land and leasing private land. I am fortunate enough to have been born into a farm family with some pretty nice habitat but also have worked hard to protect and improve it. Before it comes up on our farms besides my wife,dad, and I we allow 6 other hunters bow and gun to hunt.These guys all share the same management practices as we do and abide by the rules. It’s just frustrating to see our deer herd going backwards from what it was 5 years ago due to weekend warriors and poaching oh and lets not forget the booming yote population. Off subject just a bit has anyone else noticed the does that have been harvested most are dry. I think coyotes have a lot to due with the herd decline I had trail cam pics over a months time that a female yote killed no less than 8 fawns in that time needless to say in july her fawn killing days were ended.

Posted by gut21 on December 01

I think there needs to be limits on does and bucks, for each hunter and not just per season, something maybe like a hunter can only take a total of 2 bucks and 2 does or maybe less for all seasons combined.  I love hunting public land for the reason that , you can’t manage the deer there. Not that managing deer is wrong but I’ve always wondered who appointed us(hunters) as managers of the deer. Did hunters long before us do the same or did they see a deer come by and first thought in their head was food.  I think the though of shooting lots of does so your buck heard can grow bigger and better or healthier as they say is just a sugar coated way of saying “shoot the does, we want more, bigger racked bucks to shoot”  But hey, tv/advertising-sex sells, hunting-antlers sell.

Posted by bowfisher1 on December 01

*The point in mentioning the crush show and 100-200 does taken out was to ask if that is really managing the deer, or removing deer so more bucks will thrive?

Posted by bowfisher1 on December 01

Bowfisher, the answer to your question about hunters in the past. Deer had to be brought back into Illinois for the most part just like Turkey were. How many of you remember when 4 bucks were allowed? That didn’t last long thank the Lord. And I agree that our herd is down from a few years ago, but there are still a lot of deer. I started bow & gun deer hunting back in 1979 or 1980 and let me tell you there were stretches where locally here you might not see a deer for weeks hunting or driving (vehicles) and sometimes feel lucky to see a track. I feel safe saying that pretty much I have a good idea of the deer taken in my area at a 2 to 4 mile radius,easy, and like the rest of you I am seeing more bucks and less doe’s,I know it’s not over hunting, and I know some get poached but not many because I would hear about it. I know after this season is over 3 or 4 of us are killing some coyotes to see if this helps, nobody hunts or traps them around here anymore. And dare I say the dreaded DNR word, Cougars! It wouldn’t take one long in a certain area to kill a bunch of deer in a few years time.

Posted by berlin on December 01

My doe sightings in NW Peoria co are way down the last couple of years. Most alarming this year is that i have not seen a single fawn. It was always a fun time of year for me when the does pushed the fawns off during the rut and they ran around the woods not having a clue what was going on. I personally think that coyotes have a large part in the lack of fawn sightings. I will do my part to rid my spots of a few of them this winter. I also think those of us who do not need another doe should bypass the late winter season, i see no real benefit to the herd or hunters in this season. As it stands right now i am going to eat three tags this year, i have no problem with that.
The hunters for the hungry programs while noble in thought only give the killers an outlet for deer they have no need or want for, they seem to me to enjoy the kill more than the hunt. Some of my most enjoyable hunts have been late season hunts with multiple does milling about around me just doing what they do to survive. Don’t get my wrong i am not sitting there for the heck of it, if the right buck comes along i will shoot, but by the end of gun seasons i am usually done hunting does. Do what you think is right for your own hunting land, but try to look to the future and don’t let those unused tags bother you.

Posted by highstand on December 01

Well said HIGHSTAND.

Posted by Treehugger on December 01

EXCELLENT ARTICLE..THE QUESTION IS WHAT CAN WE DO TO GET HUNTERS TO HAVE SOME COMMON SENSE..EVERY AREA IS DIFFERENT BUT OVERALL DOE SIGHTINGS ARE DOWN..MY RUT ACTION LASTED ROUGHLY 1 WEEK..TOPS…SO IF WE HAVE 0NE ON ONE RATIO OR TWO TO ONE…IT’S A SHORT WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY TO GET ANY NOCTURNAL BUCKS TO SHOW..BETWEEN COYOTES AND DNR LEADERSHIP WE’LL NEVER SEE DEER HUNTING OF 15 YRS AGO..HELL 5 YRS..NOT SO MUCH FOR THE KILL BUT SEEING THE ACTION..YOU OLDER HUNTERS KNOW WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT…

Posted by deer1 on December 01

pretty much everything in life is cycles… from animals, women, and the earth… in all seriousness…. for a few years rabbit do well, then coyotes.then the rabbits drop off..then the yotes drop off.. and the cycle continues, same with most ecosystems…

our job with deer cycles as stewards of the land is to, even these out!!

Posted by foodplotPhil on December 02

Right on Phil.  Hope we can pull our way through THIS cycle quickly.

Posted by Treehugger on December 02

Thanks for this topic Treehugger.  One thing we can all count on is this…the state is not going to correct this mess.  The government, whether state or federal has wrecked this state.  Look at the articles in today’s paper.  Lawmakers failed AGAIN to act, and now huge companies like Sears and Cat aren’t sure they want to stay here.
I whole-heartedly believe the reason we aren’t seeing the deer we once did is this…we shot too many for too long!  Many get tagged, but this call in system allows thousands to go untagged.  I’ve said for years the total number of deer the state reports as harvested is probably 15-20 low, not counting those never found.  It’s a mess, and it’s only going to get worse.
FYI - The Crush hosts control like 6000 acres, so 100 does isn’t that many.  Don’t know if you guys are aware of that.

Posted by full draw on December 02

Here’s a response to some of the above questions.  Obtaining that “optimal” 1:1 ratio allows for fewer deer, thereby leaving more to eat.  However, we live in Illinois, where our deer get fed better than most others.  There’s plenty of food between row crops, mast crops and misc. others.  But if a buck spends 24 hours a day for how many weeks running himself to death, fighting every other buck he meets, losing 15-20% of his pre-rut weight,how likely is it he will spend most of the winter and spring trying to get his body healthy instead of growing a booner set of antlers.  I’ve argued for years the 1:1 ratio makes for better hunting rather than a healthier herd.

Posted by full draw on December 02

Just wanted to go on record I saw 8 does in the first :50 min and 2 bucks a spike and a basket rack 8.  I had an awesome hunt Thursday and the freezer is full.

Posted by PIMPSTAFFER HATER on December 07

Log In :: Register as a new member